Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 vs Alienware AW3423DWF: Bottom line But if you just want a no-frills monitor for playing games locally from your PC, then perhaps Samsung’s apps won’t matter to you. Thanks to the built-in Samsung TV and game apps, the Odyssey OLED G8 is more versatile than the comparatively straightforward Alienware AW3423DWF. The Samsung Odyssey OLED G9's menu offers various options. The monitors’ respective OSD joysticks are equally responsive when cruising through menus. Where the Odyssey OLED G8 has a semi-transparent blue background with white lettering, the AW3423DWF’s interface features a black and grey background with blue and white lettering. The monitors have clean interfaces that are simple to navigate through. Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 vs Alienware AW3423DWF: Interface/features But if you need a competitive edge, the Odyssey OLED G8 should grant it. Performance-wise, both monitors deliver the goods for most people. I didn’t notice a significant performance difference in the fast-paced Doom Eternal on Samsung’s monitor versus Alienware’s. However, if you’re a semi-hardcore player like me, the difference is negligible. If you’re a competitive gamer, I’m sure you’ll notice the difference. On paper, the Odyssey OLED G8 has a higher refresh rate and a lower response time than the AW3423DWF. The Odyssey OLED G8 (175Hz) and AW3423DWF (165Hz) deftly handled such high frame rates. Thanks to that system’s specs, Doom Eternal ran at around 160 frames per second at high settings. To test both monitors, I connected them to the Dell XPS 8950, which has a 12th gen Intel Core i5-12600k processor, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GPU and 16GB of RAM. Doom Eternal runs like a dream on the Alienware 34 AW3423DWF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |